In any given year, the supplement industry can look like the mainstream media’s favorite punching bag. In 2015, they hung that punching bag over a bonfire, painted a target on it and loaded up the big guns.
Many of those guns were aimed and fired from New York and the office of the attorney general. While it wasn’t the only story that looked bad for supplements—don’t forget HBO’s “Real Sports” segment on supplements in the military and the extended Dr. Oz implosion of the spring—looking back over more than 10 months of NBJ and newhope360 coverage of the ongoing story reveals an industry perhaps better prepared than ever to face challenges that predate the attorney general’s actions by decades.
The New York Attorney General’s investigation into herbal supplements sold at major retailers including Target and Walmart was announced the first week of February, and the industry was quick to respond.
- Botanicals industry faces the music for its adulteration problem
- NPA director says New York attorney general actions require response, not reaction
- More transparency around testing needed
- FDA called DNA barcoding invalid a year before recall
- Supplement industry needs to move out of the crosshairs
- New Yorker story suggests new tone in the echo chamber
- New York attorney general names supplement companies in investigation
Within weeks, insiders were beginning to look beyond the initial story at how the industry could make changes to strengthen the supply chain and boost consumer confidence.
- Consumer survey finds NYAG story affected trust
- Trade groups have face-to-face meetings with NYAG
- NYAG announces attorneys general 'coalition'
- GNC reaches agreement with NYAG
Nearly two months after news of the NYAG investigation broke, one of the most important retailers in the prosecutor’s sites was ready to make a deal.
- Will DNA barcode testing become the new industry standard?
- Quality is the new way forward for supplements
- Supplements and the adversity advantage
From the beginning, industry leaders were quick to question the NYAG’s use of DNA barcode testing. Three months later, they were forced to contemplate how that test could change the business and what consumers needed to know about what the industry was doing right.
- What a re-regulatory could mean
- Will DNA testing become the new industry standard?
- Third party certifications: what they mean, what they do
At the Nutrition Business Journal Summit, the implications of the New York investigation were central to every discussion, especially when the New York Times reporter who broke the story (and whose work inspired the investigation) took the stage.
Halfway into 2015, NBJ was beginning to see the effect on supplement sales.
Six months after the investigation was announced, a quiet coalition of industry figures were ready to propose very specific steps that could include a new approach to supplement regulation.
The New York attorney general’s office swung the spotlight back to supplements in September with a case against products containing devil’s claw. Though arguably more about picking very arcane straws than protecting the consumer, the action made it clear that the prosecutors were upping the sophistication of their game.
In the fall, the industry was ready to take a closer look at DNA barcode testing becoming effectively the law of the land, but a case in Oregon revealed troubling new relationships between FDA regulators and state prosecutors
- DNA barcoding will rock the supplements industry
- Oregon sues GNC
- Council for Responsible Nutrition proposes voluntary product registry
- CRN registry intended for regulators, not consumers
In November, signs of new cooperation between state and federal regulators suggested troubling times for the supplement industry.