New Hope Network is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


The non-GMO movement is more than a public relations war

  The non-GMO movement is more than a public relations war
The natural food movement isn't a fad. It's about deep values that relate to health, stewardship and the environment.

A recent article published in the New York Times examines how both the biotech and the organic industries leverage scientists to push their messages further.

The report relies mostly on emails gleaned from Freedom Of Information Act requests and explores how researchers are “brought in for the gloss of impartiality and weight of authority that come with a professor’s pedigree,” the Times says.

Companies that have vested interest in genetic engineering like Monsanto, BASF, Bayer, Dow Chemical and DuPont recruited researchers who were proponents of GMOs to answer questions about genetically engineered crops. Remember that biotech industry-funded website GMO Answers? The Times reports that on some occasions, scientists answered reader questions with canned responses provided by Ketchum, Monsanto’s PR agency.

The organic industry has played a similar game. According to the Times, pro-labeling advocates collaborated with Chuck Benbrook, a former Washington State University scientist who found that GMO crops increased herbicide applications. In response to the article, Gary Hirshberg, chairman of Just Label It, stated, “The Senate and the Obama administration should look at all of the science—including the clear and convincing evidence that GMO crops have fueled an explosion in weed killers linked to cancer—not just Monsanto’s ‘science,’ and reject legislation passed by the House to block state and federal GMO labeling.”

Advocacy with soul

With third-party information coming at them from both organic and biotech, and media outlets publishing shifting arguments for and against GMOs, of course consumers are confused about genetically engineered crops.  

The Times refers to the GMO debate as a public relations war—and in many ways it is. But the rise of the non-GMO and organic movement stems from something much deeper than wooing academics with the most clout or landing an article in the most influential publication. There is true soul and passion in those who lobby for greater food transparency.

It’s a scary place out there for a non-GMO activist: The Senate will soon examine the “DARK Act” that would preempt state’s rights to require GMO labeling; new GMO seeds are continuously being pushed through USDA approval; GMO manufacturers can pump a seemingly endless bucket of cash into pro-GMO legislation.

But the organic and non-GMO movement is about a primal yearning to better understand where our food comes from and to endorse the kind of farming we believe improves health, wellness and the environment through food purchases. That kind of passion is something biotech PR spin can never dampen.

Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.