New Hope Network is part of the Informa Markets Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Natural Foods Merchandiser

Cultivating change

Paul HawkenEconomists, CEOs and even a former president of the United States have praised his books, calling his magnum opus, Natural Capitalism (Little, Brown and Co., 1999), the bible for the next industrial revolution. Not bad for an unabashed environmentalist and humanist who since age 20 has dedicated his life to sustainability and changing the relationship between business and the environment.

Paul Hawken's latest book is Blessed Unrest: How the Largest Movement in the World Came into Being and Why No One Saw It Coming (Viking Press, 2007). The book describes how the environmental and social justice movements have converged into the largest and fastest social movement in history, comprising more than 1 million organizations throughout every country in the world.

In addition to being an author, Hawken heads the Natural Capital Institute, a research group located in Sausalito, Calif. NCI conducts research in diverse areas including socially responsible investing, global civil society, environmental funding and water. He has also founded or co-founded a number of companies, including Smith & Hawken, the garden and catalog retailer.

Hawken, 61, will serve as the keynote speaker at the 2007 Natural Products Expo East in Baltimore. He found the time from a recent book promotion tour to answer a few questions from The Natural Foods Merchandiser via e-mail about his latest book, the surge of environmentalism in this country and his opinions on the naturals industry.

Q. What prompted you to write your latest book, and how does it connect to your earlier works? It seems like it was something that must have been brewing back when Natural Capitalism was published, with obvious references to the many movements under way in the last chapter, "Once Upon a Planet."

A. You are the first person to comment on the link between the last chapter of Natural Capitalism and Blessed Unrest. In fact, I didn't even notice the connection until a few months ago, but it seems that I subconsciously telegraph my next book in the last chapter of my previous, but was not aware of doing it until now. Presumably, my next book is the "Restoration," the last chapter of Blessed.

The source of the book is observation. In the early 1990s, I was giving as many as 100 speeches or talks a year, and after every event, people would come up to talk further and give me their card. They were from civil society organizations around the world, and I would take them home, read the names of the organizations and put the cards away. At that time, I lived on a houseboat in Sausalito and kept the cards in a drawer. When the drawer was full, I placed them in a bag in my closet, and when the bag was full, I asked myself a simple question: How many organizations are there in the world working on environmental and social justice issues? I was seeing something that was more difficult to see unless one traveled from place to place: an explosion of nonprofit and nongovernmental organizations that were addressing the salient issues … organizations that were largely unknown. What I sensed was a movement that was becoming humanity's immune response to political corruption, economic disease and ecological degradation, something unlike anything we have ever seen in terms of scale, breadth and diversity.

Q. Speaking of Natural Capitalism, 1999, when the book was published, doesn't seem like such a long time ago. Yet many of the things you talked about are really gaining momentum now. Is the economic sustainability movement—the shift to natural capitalism—moving forward as fast as you thought? Why do you think that is?

A. Generally speaking, my books have a long tail. They seem to be too early and hit their stride in later years. Natural Capitalism is selling very well now because businesses all over the world are changing their practices and strategies. The rate of change occurring in corporate boardrooms now is quite extraordinary. I believe that what was once considered a fringe activity—the practice of sustainability on a commercial level—is becoming mainstream concern. [My book] The Ecology of Commerce (HarperCollins, 1993) was treated as a pariah book by the entire business press, and was not reviewed once by a business publication. It is now being rewritten so that HarperCollins can republish it under their "Business Classics" line. That is ironic because after Rupert Murdoch purchased HarperCollins, no one would even return my call [because] they were so busy cranking out books by right-wingers.

Q. While reading Natural Capitalism, I was really struck by the sheer waste we produce. How do you think we are doing today in terms of reducing that footprint and inefficiency?

A. I wish I could say things are better, but, honestly, we are doing worse. I think each of us rationalizes our consumption, justifying what we use, without knowing the cumulative impact. We get a new cell phone, and when it is obsolete throw it away, but we can't see the 475,000 other phones discarded every day, day after day. We buy pure and specialized bottled water but don't see the 2 million bottles discarded every five minutes. What is worrisome is that our habits here have spread virally to the rest of the world. There are changes that business can make to radically reduce waste, but in the end, each of us has to reflect deeply on our own impact, and that will change business.

Q. The only criticism I've come across about your latest book is that you're really "preaching to the choir." How do you get the message out to those unlikely to pick up your book about the growth of environmental and socially responsible activism?

A. Ray Anderson, the founder of [carpet manufacturer] Interface, once said that, "Yes, I am preaching to the choir, but the choir sure is getting big." [Blessed] is now on its [eighth] week on the New York Times bestseller list, and I am pretty sure I don't know all the people [who] have bought it. I recently received an e-mail from a woman in Minneapolis who said the book was the subject of the Sunday homily at her Catholic church, and that the cover was projected onto the screen at the altar during the sermon. She didn't say if they had a choir.

I think you are right in one sense. My thesis is that there is an unnamed movement in the world that is addressing social justice and the environment. Unbeknownst to itself and the media, it has become the largest social movement in human history. The book is describing that movement, which easily consists of [100 million] to 200 million people. So let's call that the choir. The organizations and individuals that comprise this movement directly affect the daily activities of another 3 billion people, not a group one can easily categorize or pigeonhole.

I feel that you get the message out to people by being true to your principles, by living a meaningful life and by walking your talk. People prefer to change themselves than have others try to do it, and usually do so because of example rather than coercion or fear. One by one, people are waking up to the fact that we live on a smaller planet that has real constraints, and that if our children's children are going to have a decent life, we have to change ours now. Many a CEO and businessperson changed their career and company reading my previous books, but I never directed my books to any particular audience. When the publicist at Viking Press first asked me who my audience was for the latest book, I said what I always say: "I have no idea."

Q. There are many books, programs and such now on many of the same themes you've been writing and speaking about for years. How do you see this? A fad? A trend? A real awakening?

A. It is a real awakening, but it is a real awakening American style, which means it has all the trappings of a fad. Magazines, retailers and entrepreneurs are going to town exploiting this change in awareness, and although that is to be expect?ed, it is the froth on the surface of the water, not the ocean underneath. There is a sea change in awareness occurring. Politicians are the last to understand it, business picks up on it a bit sooner, and then there is the media, which generally cannot cover a story unless they tart it up and make it sound and feel trendy. The media has disparaged and ridiculed the environmental movement for decades—the granola movement, the Prius set, treehuggers—and are now falling all over themselves to put Arnold Schwarzenegger, Al Gore and Leonardo DiCaprio on the cover of the magazines. That is why it appears like a fad; it is not people who are fickle but the media. However, this is the real deal.

Q. I believe I read that you founded several natural foods companies in the '60s and '70s at the time when that industry was really born. How has the industry changed for the better and the worse?

A. When the natural foods industry first emerged, there was a tacit understanding that it wasn't just about what was sold in the store, but the whole supply chain including localization. We were trying to create food webs and networks, not chains and conglomerates. In order for food to be "natural," commodities cannot be flown in from Chile or shipped in from China. Nor can you have a 30,000-acre farm in California that grow[s] "organic" carrots for the rest of the country. I think it was better understood that this was not just about how food appeared at the retail level; it was about rebuilding the viability of small farms and rural communities, about building a network of provenders, not a chain of look-alike stores. It was not about the concentration of purchasing power, but about the diversification of our food system. The destructive food system we were replacing came about because of concentrations of power and money, and when power is too concentrated, it always becomes pathological. The industry today is certainly far better than it was in the '60s, no question about that. It was embryonic then. However, I cannot say it is better than it was in the '80s.

Q. From your experience with the naturals industry, how does it stack up according to the principles you espouse in Natural Capitalism and Blessed Unrest?

A. It is very difficult to generalize because there are so many companies, and the companies run the gamut from divisions of multinational corporations to small, family-run bakeries and manufacturers. In general, I would say that the industry would do well to address the following issues: climate, carbon emissions, packaging waste, localization, supply-chain labor practices, and a few more I could name. Consumers and perhaps the media have given the industry a free pass because the product is nutritious, organic and not toxic. In so doing, other issues have not been addressed. Additionally, there has been a weakening of organic standards promoted by the larger companies within the industry who are relatively new players. If I went back into business today, I would want to start a new standard called biological agriculture to distinguish food from that which is grown under the now more dilute organic standards.

Q. What's not happening in the naturals industry—or industry, in general—that needs to start happening in terms of what you talk about in your work?

A. I think the industry needs to have a clear position about global issues, particular[ly] greenhouse gases. I do not see or read everything, but I cannot remember the natural foods industry enunciating a climate policy, or at the very least pointing out that rapid climate change will devastate agriculture, food security and the industry itself. I also believe that any substantive carbon policy has to touch upon shipping, sourcing, packaging and waste.

Paul HawkenAnd now for the rest of the story. Here we give you the remainder of the interview we conducted with entrepreneur and environmentalist Paul Hawken that appears in the September 2007 issue of The Natural Foods Merchandiser.

Q. I am struck by your optimism. Why are you generally optimistic about humanity considering the challenges and obstacles that you so clearly spell out? A related question: The example of what can be accomplished was eloquently recounted in the chapter of NC about the Brazilian city that has become the envy of all South America. Yet, that seems to be the exception rather than the rule, though certainly we've seen cities act more progressively than our own federal government. What is your assessment of what's going on in American cities today and the way industry operates in that interconnected web?

A. There are two basic wild cards in our future. The first is the rate that living and climatic systems change. Our understanding is incomplete, but we know that ecological systems can reach thresholds, trigger points, where they undergo a rapid transition leading to a collapse. This is why some environmentalists can appear shrill, or why some call Al Gore's recent speeches religious in tone. People who are very close to the science of climate change, oceans, forests and ecosystems in general are freaked out. The other wild card is humanity. What we hear about with unrelenting frequency is humanity's failings: greed, killings, war, terror and corruption. What we do not hear about is this movement, the remarkable willingness of people to change their lives on behalf of others and people they will never know, their work and dedication to justice and the environment. Basically, something extraordinary is happening [in] the world today, and it is largely ignored. As to cities, while we watch our federal government tie its shoelaces together in a cloud of ignorance and corruption, we are seeing substantive and nonpartisan leadership on a municipal level with respect to sustainability and climate. Our mayors better represent the leadership of this country than our Congress.

Q. Could you touch briefly about Wiser Earth and the connection to your new book and work?

A. WISER means World Index of Social and Environmental Responsibility. is a Web site that serves the people who are transforming the world. It is a collaboratively written, free-content, open-source networking platform that links [nongovernmental oranizations], funders, business, government, social entrepreneurs, students, organizers, academics, activists, scientists and citizens. WISER creates the space for civil society, the private sector, and government to collaboratively define, address, and solve social and environmental problems. The more than 1 million organizations and the 100 million individuals who actively work toward ecological sustainability, economic justice, human rights, and political accountability work on issues that are systemically interconnected and intertwined. Their effectiveness to prevent harm and institute positive change is undermined by the lack of a collective awareness, duplicative efforts and poor connectivity. My sense is that we are moving from a world that is shaped by privilege to a community-created world. This massive change in the loci of power calls for a new system of awareness, support, communication and collaboration. We started to create the site at the same time as I started to write the book so that we could provide the hard data to back up the book, but also to provide a means of connectivity to the movement.

Q. Forgive this indulgence, as I know questions about the future and gazing into the proverbial crystal ball are cliché, but I am curious: Where do you see the planet in 50 years, the middle of this century, in terms of the social, economic and environmental responsibility that you talk about?

A. It will be the stroke of midnight for the rest of our life. How we respond will depend greatly on what we do now. If you look at the data and are hopeful, then you don't understand the data. If you look at the people [and] are not heartened, you don't have a pulse. Evolution arises from the bottom up—so, too, does hope. What will happen 50 years from now is greatly determined by what we are doing today. The only reason to make predictions is to get a better handle on the present. Crystal balls are bowling balls in drag and tell us very little because all predictions are wrong. What we know about today is that we are collectively compromising our future and civilization. Essentially, you can see almost all economic activity as a means to steal the future and sell it in the present. The question we have to ask, and path we have to take, is where we heal the future and monetize that activity in the present. Simply stated, we can farm and de-carbonize the soil, further exacerbating climate change, or we can farm and sequester carbon by creating more organic matter. Either is possible. If there is anything to be learned from the past, it is that it provides no guide to the future. If the realities we faced were merely high oil prices and rising sea levels, we would be fortunate indeed. What scientists closer to the issues of climate change are trying to convey is that climate is part of a larger system, including agriculture and hydrological cycles. The food system of the world is hugely dependent on climate. We should probably use the term extreme climatic volatility. The future we face does not ensure a steady food supply, a stable economy or international peace. This is not merely the largest movement in the world, it is the most important. Human beings are trying to re-imagine their relationship to each other and this home we call Earth, and it cannot happen soon enough.

Q. Other than the environment, what would you say is your next biggest priority in terms of investing your own personal energy and time?

A. The subject of the book is how two seemingly disparate types of nonprofit movements are coming together to become one movement, environment and social justice. This is a critical point, because I do not believe the environmental movement actually is an environmental movement. It is a justice movement, and because it has been promulgated by wealthier people, mainly white people who did not experience issues concerning rights and justice, the environmental movement finds itself in a demographic cul-de-sac without the requisite understanding and support needed to make the necessary changes in society, industry and patterns of consumption. What you see right now is the environmental movement focus on climate change as the mother of all issues, saying in effect that the house is burning and that we all need to get on the climate/environmental bus, or all else is for naught. I believe that the cause of massive carbon emissions relate to deeper issues of privilege and rights, and you cannot solve the climate issue by being Henny Penny or Chicken Little. I think the environmental bus needs to slow down and stop, and all of those aboard need to get onto the social justice bus because, in fact, there is only one bus. Two lenses will likely dominate our future: social justice and humanity's relationship to the environment. Both focus on exploitation, and both are the history of people's attempts to free themselves from abuse. We face a crossroad as to what constitutes the most salient evidence of progress. Will it be single measures of material accumulation such as [gross domestic product], or will it be the condition of the Earth and its inhabitants? Social justice and attending to the needs of [the] planet proceed in parallel; the abuse of one entails the exploitation of the other. Refugees, peasants and the poor are the forests, soils and oceans of society; each constitutes surplus value that has been taken repeatedly by those in power, whether governments or multinational corporations.

Natural Foods Merchandiser volume XXVIII/number 9/p. 28, 30-31

TAGS: Archive News
Hide comments


  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.