New ingredients face tougher safety scrutiny

Todd Runestad, Content Director,, Sr. Supplements Editor

April 30, 2005

2 Min Read
New ingredients face tougher safety scrutiny

With as many as four out of five new dietary ingredient (NDI) submissions being rejected by the Food and Drug Administration, some say the agency is using the NDI process to quash product innovation while others claim it is making up for previous regulatory inaction in the cases of ephedra and andro.

NDIs require a 75-day pre-market safety notification of any ingredient not already on the market in the US by November 1994. But in some cases the FDA is saying that different botanical extraction methods — even of age-old herbs with stellar safety records — necessitate a new NDI filing.

?Ultimately, both sides need to ask and answer whether an ingredient presents a safety question,? said Loren Israelsen, president of consultancy LDI Group in Utah. ?Alkaloids, glycosides, and things known to be chemically and physiologically active should be on the FDA?s work list. But if it?s chamomile extract or echinacea, we know a lot about what?s in those things, so there?s not a real issue there.?

He said that if a company is intentionally emphasising a part of a botanical extract that has a clear biological effect, then it should err on the side of caution. ?FDA thinks this NDI process is a significant part of the safety net,? Israelsen said.

Some companies are gaining GRAS status for their ingredients. It is seen as being more rigorous and safer (and more expensive) than NDI notifications.

?GRAS is not part of supplements language, but that higher standard of safety demonstrated by a GRAS assessment can be a good marketing tool,? said James C Griffiths, PhD, director of toxicology at Burdock Group in Florida, a third-party safety assessor.

He said that while supplements must meet a ?reasonable expectation of safety,? GRAS and food additives must meet a higher threshold, of ?reasonable certainty of safety.?

?This clearly signifies FDA is becoming more rigorous,? said Israelsen. ?The question is, too rigorous? Are they applying food additive thinking to supplements??

Whether the FDA will find a middle ground after the comment process will take months to tell.

About the Author(s)

Todd Runestad

Content Director,, Sr. Supplements Editor, Natural Products Insider

I've been writing on nutrition science news since 1997. I'm The content director for NaturalProductsInsidercom and digital magazines. Other incarnations: supplements editor for, Delicious Living and Natural Foods Merchandiser. Former editor-in-chief of Functional Ingredients magazine and still cover raw material innovations and ingredient science.

Connect with me here

My daily vitamin regime includes a morning smoothie with a range of powders including protein, collagen and spirulina; a quality multi, B complex, C with bioflavonoids, >2,000IU vitamin D, E, magnesium, high-selenium yeast, PQQ, choline, alpha-lipoic acid with carnitine, coQ10, fish oil concentrate, probiotics and some adaptogenic herbs. 

Subscribe and receive the latest updates on trends, data, events and more.
Join 57,000+ members of the natural products community.

You May Also Like