I’m convinced George Orwell never died. He’s alive and well, writing website copy and news releases for General Mills.
The article began, “Cheerios—a healthier breakfast staple—makes an upstart move as one of the first high-profile brands to cut out genetically modified organisms from its ingredients. As more brands debate whether to follow, expect the GMO debate to escalate.
Wow. Big news. Really big news. So big that I decided to dive into the General Mills website to discover what prompted the company to make this historic change. I soon found myself enmeshed in a tangle of corporate communication so tortured that I could nearly hear the screams.
One paragraph explains, “Why change anything at all? It’s simple. We did it because we think consumers may embrace it. General Mills offers non-GM choices in most of our major categories in the U.S., and now we can say the same about the ingredients in original Cheerios.
“It’s the unique and simple nature of original Cheerios that made this possible—and even that required significant investment over nearly a year."
Then, the rest of the website continues to promote the benefits and safety of GMOs. Oh, and it also mentions that this change only applies to the original Cheerios and not to the other 11 varieties the company markets. Yogurt Burst Cheerios … not included. Apple Cinnamon Cheerios … not included. Banana Nut Cheerios … you get the point.
OK, so it’s time to put my cynicism aside. General Mills’ move may actually prove to be an extremely positive development for the GMO labeling campaign. Companies respond to consumer demand. General Mills is acknowledging that a significant slice of its customers is avoiding GMOs, for many reasons.
And its announcement comes just as the GMO labeling issue may be coming to a head.
Sometime this year, the FDA is expected to issue voluntary guidelines for GMO labeling, a scant 13 years after issuing Draft Guidance on the issue. The Organic Trade Association has convened a task force to work on this issue. Other consumer groups are gearing up, too.
The General Mills website announcing its non-GMO Cheerios also states, “General Mills supports a national solution. There’s a government-approved national standard for labeling non-GM products in Europe and in Canada, and General Mills believes a national standard for labeling non-GM products would benefit American consumers as well.”
The European standard requires that food labels must disclose whether a food contains or consists of GMOs. Under that standard, “new” original Cheerios without GMO ingredients would not have to carry any special label. The other 11 Cheerios products would.
I’m willing to agree to that.